home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: winternet.com!not-for-mail
- From: jdege@winternet.com (Jeff Dege)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Borland should be ashamed. My experience with BC5.0.
- Followup-To: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Date: 21 Apr 1996 00:30:41 GMT
- Organization: StarNet Communications, Inc
- Message-ID: <4lbvjh$rlp@blackice.winternet.com>
- References: <4l6d1b$219@linet06.li.net> <4l827d$1la@texas.nwlink.com> <4lbqv4$r3k@linet06.li.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: subzero.winternet.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
-
- On Sat, 20 Apr 1996 23:10:32 GMT, Bob Silvern (bsilvern@li.net) wrote:
- :
- : I spent a few hours of my time compiling all this information because I thought
- : it was of interest to my fellow C/C++ programmers. I apologize if I wasted a
- : few precious moments of your time, but you didn't have to read it all if it
- : didn't interest you.
-
- I found it useful, so don't let the nay-sayers get you down.
-
- It did seem, though, that many of your problems were IDE-related, and
- we gave up on IDEs a long time ago. We've never been able to integrate
- third-party or custom code generators into the dependency mechanism with
- any success, it was a royal pain making sure that code generation options
- were always set the way we wanted them, and what with one thing another
- we gave up on using the IDEs with any of the compilers and went back to
- makefiles.
-
- Does anybody have real experience with how well the command-line
- utilities work?
-
- --
- Nearly every electrical engineer believes deep in his heart that he
- is better at writing computer software than any computer programmer,
- and can show as proof the fact that he has written a number of small
- applications, each of which was done quickly, easily, and exactly met
- his needs.
-
-